The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Develop and manage a knowledge bank on access to the built environment for people with disabilities.
|
|
Sources of information on the requirements of people with disabilities to enable access to and use of the built environment are researched and evaluated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sources of information on compliance requirements for access to and use of the built environment are researched and evaluated. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Forums for discussion and debate regarding effects of disabilities on access to and use of the built environment are researched and used. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes are put in place to ensure access to and currency of information regarding legislative changes and best practice solutions. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information management system is developed and maintained to ensure currency and availability of information in knowledge bank. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is shared and discussed with internal or external personnel as required. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse effects of disabilities on access to and use of the built environment.
|
|
Static and functional anthropometrics of people with physical disabilities are researched, and requirements for access and use are analysed and confirmed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Functional abilities and needs of people with sensory impairment are researched, and requirements for access and use are analysed and confirmed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Functional abilities and needs of people with cognitive impairment are researched, and requirements for access and use are analysed and confirmed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Advancements in ergonomic practices and data are monitored, and information is applied to analysis of requirements for access to and use of the built environment. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse compliance requirements for access to and use of the built environment.
|
|
Content and application of legislation, standards and codesare analysed in relation to ergonomic principles and access and use requirements of people with disabilities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Content and application of government development policies and urban planning regulations are analysed in relation to ergonomic principles and access and use requirements of people with disabilities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Conflicting compliance provisions and access issues that are not the subject of legislation are identified, and access solutions are analysed and critiqued in suitable forums. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contribute to the development of the access consulting sector.
|
|
Opportunities for learning and reflection on the needs of people with disabilities and the principles of access and use are sought, and findings and ideas are discussed with colleagues and refined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research findings on best practices in access and use provision are documented and shared with colleagues and professionals within the framework of access governance. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Opportunities for participation in professional debate and decision making regarding access and use compliance issues and solutions are sought and contributions made. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Opportunities for improvement of access and use provisions are sought and contributions made. Completed |
Evidence:
|